Musicstax
Busca Avançada
Metrics
Your Stats
🔥Growing Artists
|
Pitch your song
|
Stuart Chatwood
Battle in the Warrens
Darkest Dungeon (Original Video Game Soundtrack) [Deluxe Edition]
Preview
Pagina inicial
>>
Stuart Chatwood
>>
Battle in the Warrens
BPM
92 BPM
Chave
G Maj
Sonoridade
-14.3db
Time signature
4/4
Popularidade
41%
Energia
62%
Danceability
50%
Positividade
55%
Discurso
3%
Gravado ao vivo
14%
Acústico
53%
Instrumentalidade
88%
Tweet
Share
Embed
Descubra músicas semelhantes a
Battle in the Warrens
Stuart Chatwood -
The Sluice
23% popularity • 92 bpm • D Maj • 05:03 • 4/4
Piotr Musiał -
Snow Is Ever-Changing (Bonus Track)
26% popularity • 92 bpm • C Maj • 01:48 • 4/4
Critical Role -
Passage to Xhorhas
25% popularity • 92 bpm • C Maj • 03:47 • 3/4
P.T. Adamczyk -
Just Punishment
32% popularity • 93 bpm • A# min • 02:15 • 4/4
Masami Ueda -
Third Demise
21% popularity • 94 bpm • A min • 04:13 • 4/4
Daniel Licht -
Intro the Return
44% popularity • 90 bpm • E min • 01:10 • 4/4
Stuart Chatwood -
Behold the Sands of Time
16% popularity • 92 bpm • G min • 02:45 • 4/4
Kevin Riepl -
Lawgiver
25% popularity • 90 bpm • D Maj • 02:06 • 4/4
Clark Aboud -
Escape Plan
21% popularity • 94 bpm • F min • 03:37 • 4/4
SIE Sound Team -
Terror
39% popularity • 90 bpm • F# Maj • 03:51 • 4/4
Mikolai Stroinski -
Commanding The Fury
48% popularity • 90 bpm • G Maj • 02:08 • 4/4
Piotr Musiał -
For Honor! For Toussaint!
44% popularity • 90 bpm • A min • 02:04 • 3/4
Stuart Chatwood -
Battle in the Warrens
41% popularity • 92 bpm • G Maj • 01:20 • 4/4
Brad Derrick -
Weapons Drawn
43% popularity • 94 bpm • F Maj • 01:47 • 4/4
Clique para ver mais canções semelhantes a
Battle in the Warrens
Descubra mais faixas por
Stuart Chatwood
Battle in the Warrens informação
Nome
Battle in the Warrens
Artista(s)
Stuart Chatwood
Álbum
Darkest Dungeon (Original Video Game Soundtrack) [Deluxe Edition]
Data de lançamento
22nd June 2017
ISRC
UST8K1648668
Chave
G Maj
BPM
92
Onoridade (db)
-14.3db
Time signature
4/4
Duração
01:20
Número da Canção
6 of 18
Explícito
Não